Cedar trees considered the green glacier of the Great Plains
The issue of cedar tree invasion into South Dakota’s rangelands tends to be a regional conversation, explained Pete Bauman, SDSU Extension Range Field Specialist.
“Those in the south central and southeastern portions of South Dakota understand well the challenges in controlling these invasive trees. There is generally broad agreement among most resource professionals that these trees are in fact changing our landscape in a negative way. However, forging a definitive path toward addressing the issue becomes a dilemma as best management practices are not always clear,” Bauman said.
The reason? Bauman said not only is control difficult, but the cedar tree has a long history of positive uses in shelterbelts and wildlife plantings.
“The issue becomes complicated by the debate over whether the appeal cedars have for humans and certain wildlife outweigh their overall threats to the landscape,” Bauman said.
This winter, during the Society for Range Management annual meeting, a symposium was held on cedar control in the Great Plains, range professors, economists and social scientists from across the southern and central plains spoke on the overwhelmingly negative impact these species have on the plains. “The message was clear – juniper and cedar are spreading rapidly, the wave is heading north, they are creating changes on the landscape that are primarily negative, and the Dakota’s are the cedar frontier,” Bauman said.
In a nutshell, Bauman said, the expansion of these species across the plains is now being dubbed the ‘Green Glacier,’ and the reality is that this expansion will continue to impact rangeland productivity and management.
“The most challenging message to come from recent research is that cedar invasion appears to be primarily a product of removal of fire from the grasslands,” he said. “While it is true that active planting of cedars will continue to create unnatural source populations, land management practices such as grazing do not significantly contribute to the spread of the plant.”
Simply put, Bauman explained that the grand expansion of cedars is the by-product of active planting and fire exclusion. “Where fire has been preserved or re-introduced as a management tool, the trees are generally controlled regardless of the other grassland management practices that occur,” he said.
Rocky Mountain & Eastern Red Cedar
In South Dakota there are two types of cedars which create concern, the Rocky Mountain juniper (Juniperus scopulorum) and the eastern red cedar (J. virginiana). The Rocky Mountain Juniper is believed to be native to the Missouri River breaks region and the Black Hills, while the eastern red cedar is thought to be mostly introduced.
For those unfamiliar with the difference, Bauman explained that the juniper is more of a bushy-type plant while the cedar takes on more of an upright growth form typical of a pine or spruce tree. Eastern red cedars are the common tree utilized in shelterbelts and wildlife habitat plantings.
Although juniper may be expanding in density and area in several regions of south central South Dakota, it is the eastern red cedar that Bauman said appears to be the species of dominant statewide concern because of its popularity, hardiness in plantings, and appeal to birds which are the primary disperser of its seeds.
“Escaped or volunteer cedar trees likely occur in every county of the state. Aside from initial plantings, volunteer trees are generally found in fence rows, under power lines, in hardwood shelterbelts, pastures, Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), and other areas,” he said.
What can be done?
Biologically, cedars are tough. Bauman explained that their waxy coating and relative resilience can make them a formidable foe. Chemical applications are generally not practical, have mixed results and can impact non-target vegetation.
However, cedars are susceptible to two basic control methods. The first, Bauman said is the fact that cedars lack the ability to re-sprout. “While cedar saplings might cover a pasture, once they are dead, they are dead,” he said.
Killing a small cedar, he explained can be accomplished easily through mechanical control either via chainsaw, hand-loppers, hand saws, ATV-mounted shears, or larger carbide cutters mounted to skid-steer loaders. When mechanically controlling cedar, it is necessary to remove the tree below the lowest branch, so care should be taken if using rotary mowers.
The cedar’s second weakness is its susceptibility to fire – primarily when young. “Fire can be an effective tool when applied to saplings less than 3 or 4 feet tall. The key to fire use is to ensure an adequate fuel load to create enough heat to kill the tree,” Bauman said.
This is best accomplished by resting the pasture for a full season prior to the burn,” Bauman said.
While larger trees can be killed with fire as well, Bauman said these types of fires generally require implementation during hotter and dryer conditions – usually early spring. “Burning in these conditions of increased fire risk requires experience and methods that most South Dakota landowners currently do not have, so caution should be exercised,” he said.
In southern states of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska, Bauman said the impacts of the cedar invasion are immense. “Ranchers have lost large percentages of pastures, sometimes whole ranches, to the invasion. In these states ranchers have been forced to form community burn teams to combat the problem,” he said. “We will likely be forced to employ the same tactics here in South Dakota in the not-to-distant future.”
Presentations on cedar control from the Annual Society for Range Management meeting are available at http://bit.ly/QCePID. To learn more, visit iGrow.org or contact Bauman at Peter.Bauman@sdstate.edu.